What to expect 73 skylane pponk

Have you modified your aircraft? STC? STOL Kit? Major rebuild from just a data plate?

Re: What to expect 73 skylane pponk

Postby Rob » Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:27 pm

Hi aqua,

On that day it was two MT's. A MT-15-D/210-58 and an MT-9-D/210-58. (2 and 3 blade 83") versions.
The two blade was first, so if we were splitting hairs it may have had a 1 to 2 degree temperature favor, but in the end it didn't hold a candle to the three blade. DA was 220 +/- feet.

Again, there was no short field technique used, and either prop was capable of leaving the ground in 200' or less, under those conditions, with some technique applied.

As Russ pointed out, take off isn't everything, and IMHO even though there is only a 9# difference between the two props, the 2 blade flies nicer when slowed up. Another point worth mentioning is the 3 blade came in at less than a pound difference in weight than my C-66. The 2 blade was lighter.

Take care, Rob
All of us are given sh*t in life, the smart ones grow from it...the rest fling it at each other like monkeys.
Rob
Posts: 768
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:34 am
 
Rob's Photo gallery

Re: What to expect 73 skylane pponk

Postby aqua » Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:47 pm

Rob.

Thanks for the data, that sounds like a fun test.

FWIW, I looked at the Flight Resource comparison and it has the 86" 401 at 82 lbs. According to McCauley the 86" 401 with spinner weighs 70 lbs. If so, the 3 blade MT is only 13 lbs lighter than the McCauley. Nothing to sneeze at, but roughly 1/2 the stated 25 lb weight difference.
User avatar
aqua
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:43 pm
Location: NY
 
aqua's Photo gallery

Previous

Return to Modifications

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Owyheeflyer and 2 guests