by Cary » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:54 pm
I can't remember the last time I filed a VFR flight plan--at least several years ago. When I'm on a long cross country, I habitually file IFR even in good weather, and if it's a shorter cross country, I'll frequently use flight following. I always monitor the nearest ATC frequency, anyway. Last summer I bought a PLB, and I have the "I'm here and safe" service (406 Link), so that I can notify my SO that I've arrived, if I have no cell phone coverage.
The problem I've always had with VFR flight plans is that for them to work, one would have to fly exactly as planned. But one of the joys of VFR flight is the ability to divert, to go see that "whatever" over that way, or circle that lake over there, or take a closer look at that building--or stop for lunch or a potty break. Or sometimes it's necessary to divert, due to weather, mechanical issues, or personal issues. Yet to change the routing of a VFR flight plan is pretty cumbersome. Even extending it to account for delays can be problematic at times. I first began to realize how questionable their value was, when I was a student eons ago. On the return leg for my long solo cross country from Homer to Anchorage in January 1973, I had to make a significant diversion to circumvent a storm. If I'd gone down on that diversion with only a VFR flight plan, they'd have never found me. But diverting but staying in contact with Anchorage Center was a no-brainer.
All FWIW.
Cary
"I have slipped the surly bonds of earth..., put out my hand and touched the face of God." J.G. Magee